No. Sometimes I simply use words in foreign languages, or really obscure slang. Or really big words.Chozon1 wrote:Making up words to use in place of dirty words?
Such as calling someone an insipid vaca.
No. Sometimes I simply use words in foreign languages, or really obscure slang. Or really big words.Chozon1 wrote:Making up words to use in place of dirty words?
I'd consider it. Decent music can be found anywhere.ScotchRobbins wrote:Indie rock?
It all depends on the kind of reaction you're going for. Are you trying to stun, or offend? Your target audience also plays into it as well. (Oh, and I was trying to keep my sample insult tame for the forums... although most of my insults do tend to be synonymous with "imbecile" somehow.Chozon1 wrote:See though, I know what that means, and it doesn't offend me. If someone spat out unintelligible syllables and stormed off, I'd be more stunned.
That's deep, man. What is truth? Is it limited to a person's perspective, or are there some truths that are universal? And will those truths still be the same if no one believes it?Chozon1 wrote:The concept of belief equaling truth?
ScotchRobbins wrote:Superheroes?
My local game / comic store participates every year, but I've never gone. From what I've heard, the crowd is horrendous. Good for business, though....Emwok wrote:Free comic book day?
Erm... if I had to guess, sometime in the spring....ScotchRobbins wrote:Do you know when the Spring Sale will come?
Profound indeed.Sstavix wrote:Erm... if I had to guess, sometime in the spring....ScotchRobbins wrote:Do you know when the Spring Sale will come?
Is she? I thought she was a scientist... and a potato.Emwok wrote: GLaDOS is a jerk?
I didn't know buffaloes had wings. Maybe they've been drinking too much Red Bull.ScotchRobbins wrote: Buffalo wings?
This...I dunno. I believe this proves the concept of belief = truth to be incorrect. It only works as a thoughtful question on paper, not in reality. Your hypothetical example only changes the concept of the thing, not the thing itself. They call the leaves gray, I call it green, the French call it vert. Yet light still reflects off the chlorophyll in the green side of the spectrum. "Green" is just the word we've chosen to describe the reality. The tribe couldn't comprehend planes, cars, or computers, but does that mean I should morally question their existence?Sstavix wrote:That's deep, man. What is truth? Is it limited to a person's perspective, or are there some truths that are universal? And will those truths still be the same if no one believes it?
Let's think of a hypothetical example. Suppose you are an anthropologist and you come across an isolated, long-forgotten tribe of people deep in the Amazon forest. After you learn enough of their language to communicate with them (and get them to trust you enough so they don't try to kill you whenever you walk into their village), you learn that they have no concept of the color "green." Through some sort of genetic anomaly, the entire tribe is colorblind - they see everything in shades of gray. You inform them that the sky is blue, the leaves are green, your hair is brown, that sort of thing. They shake their heads, not comprehending what you're saying, and insist that it's all gray hues (they apparently have 200 words for "gray"). What is the truth in this scenario? Are the leaves green simply because you believe that they are green? If so, does that invalidate the beliefs of the primitive tribe?