Christ Centered Gamer

The Fountain

I've heard that one should see this movie twice in order to fully grasp it. Well, I've seen it twice now and my opinion remains the same. It's imaginative, but it never makes that powerful relational connection to its audience that it needs to be a great, or even good film.

C

Oro... the story was awesome. Vintage Tarantino. Obi... that makes me sad
I saw:
The Talented Mr. Ripley B+
and
most of Sexy Beast.

Drew. I am disappoint that you think it's that good.

I judge you. -_-

District 9

Still awesome the second time. <3 this movie.

Mr. and Mrs. Smith - Meh, still on the zero scale for list of Angelina Jolie movies that I like. Still, another example showing both Brad Pitt and Doug Liman are pretty good at what they do.

The Kid - Not fantastic, but I've always liked this movie.

Most of Night at the Museum - Utter dreck. The only thing good about it is the cast.

I must be getting soft because the bookend movies really do nothing for me but The Kid actually made me tear up. And this is like..at least the tenth time I've watched it.

Drewsov wrote:Oro... the story was awesome. Vintage Tarantino.

I've...never been a Tarantino fan in general.

Obibear wrote:The Fountain

I've heard that one should see this movie twice in order to fully grasp it. Well, I've seen it twice now and my opinion remains the same. It's imaginative, but it never makes that powerful relational connection to its audience that it needs to be a great, or even good film.

C

And you sent me a clip of this trying to prove Hugh Jackman's a good actor?


I laugh at you.




I saw various parts of Airplane.

Again.


I need to see the whole thing. XD

The Country Bears. Yes. I watched this of my own accord and free will.

btw 4000 post lolz

Hurray for Trip!!

Part of Short Circuit. Better than a lot of 80's movies, but Ally Sheedy's acting was atrocious!

Push

Huh.

I really liked this movie, but I didn't like all the loose ends the story left.

I mean really, you call that an ending?

B

Deepfreeze32 wrote:

Obibear wrote:The Fountain

I've heard that one should see this movie twice in order to fully grasp it. Well, I've seen it twice now and my opinion remains the same. It's imaginative, but it never makes that powerful relational connection to its audience that it needs to be a great, or even good film.

C

And you sent me a clip of this trying to prove Hugh Jackman's a good actor?


I laugh at you.

The quality of a movie is not determined solely by the acting, dude.

Hugh Jackman and Rachel Weisz were the best part of the film, in my opinion.

Die Hard

Happy trails Hans.

That is all.

A

Rocky IV.

Love these films.

Obibear wrote:The quality of a movie is not determined solely by the acting, dude.

Hugh Jackman and Rachel Weisz were the best part of the film, in my opinion.

Mind the tongue.


But, I stand by what I said.

Hugh Jackman is a terrible actor.


Rachel Weisz is good though.....


Now I am stuck. XD

Deepfreeze32 wrote:

Obibear wrote:The quality of a movie is not determined solely by the acting, dude.

Hugh Jackman and Rachel Weisz were the best part of the film, in my opinion.

Mind the tongue.


But, I stand by what I said.

Hugh Jackman is a terrible actor.


Rachel Weisz is good though.....


Now I am stuck. XD

Mind the tongue? What?

Hugh Jackman is a good actor. But there's apparently no sense arguing that point further.

LAST MOVIE I WATCHED WAS AWESOME!!!!!

Gonna watch some old family videos of when I was a blubbering baby. -__-