I totally think it's opinion. I also totally think that, while I find the man completely and totally detestable, I wouldn't actually ever want a person to be "removed."
Rush Limbaugh may be a blight upon humanity, but he's still a person.
And of whom are you referring to?
You wouldn't remove some horribly vile and evil person? For the sake of humanity? Like that guy who makes stinky cheese?
And... watch this video to know whom... if you actually watch the whole thing, I'd commend you. You'll probably exit out within 10 seconds...
I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do - Robert A Heinlein
Chozon1 wrote:Is it on your life goals list to slay a dragon and save the princess?
It... could be. I'm not going to tell you what I do in my free time. >.>
GarthVader wrote:
Drewsov wrote:
GarthVader wrote:
*Laughing*
I totally think you're wrong... lol.
Thoughts on the new Dis-information Czar?
I totally think it's opinion. I also totally think that, while I find the man completely and totally detestable, I wouldn't actually ever want a person to be "removed."
Rush Limbaugh may be a blight upon humanity, but he's still a person.
And of whom are you referring to?
You wouldn't remove some horribly vile and evil person? For the sake of humanity? Like that guy who makes stinky cheese?
And... watch this video to know whom... if you actually watch the whole thing, I'd commend you. You'll probably exit out within 10 seconds...
I like stinky cheese. And no. Even if the person in question could be considered anathema, I still wouldn't want them to disappear. One person--one evil person--can change the lives of thousands through a heinous act, which can later change the lives of thousands again, this time for good. An easy example of this is Hitler. He attempted to destroy the Jews through genocide (which is, no doubt, a bad thing), but as a result of that, the nation of Israel was reformed.
And I don't find her to be particularly annoying. Likable? Nope. But she's not annoying, either.
You were telling him about Buddha, you were telling him about Mohammed in the same breath. You never mentioned one time the Man who came and died a criminal’s death...
I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do - Robert A Heinlein
You were telling him about Buddha, you were telling him about Mohammed in the same breath. You never mentioned one time the Man who came and died a criminal’s death...
I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do - Robert A Heinlein
You were telling him about Buddha, you were telling him about Mohammed in the same breath. You never mentioned one time the Man who came and died a criminal’s death...
Drewsov wrote:
I like stinky cheese. And no. Even if the person in question could be considered anathema, I still wouldn't want them to disappear. One person--one evil person--can change the lives of thousands through a heinous act, which can later change the lives of thousands again, this time for good. An easy example of this is Hitler. He attempted to destroy the Jews through genocide (which is, no doubt, a bad thing), but as a result of that, the nation of Israel was reformed.
Good answers.
Drewsov wrote:
And I don't find her to be particularly annoying. Likable? Nope. But she's not annoying, either.
Um . . . *facepalm* ( )
I think you misunderstood me. I didn't ask if you found her to be annoying, and I wasn't supplying her as a choice for people that you would consider removing.
I was simply inquiring as to what you thought about her position. About the fact that her position even existed.
Drewsov wrote:
I like stinky cheese. And no. Even if the person in question could be considered anathema, I still wouldn't want them to disappear. One person--one evil person--can change the lives of thousands through a heinous act, which can later change the lives of thousands again, this time for good. An easy example of this is Hitler. He attempted to destroy the Jews through genocide (which is, no doubt, a bad thing), but as a result of that, the nation of Israel was reformed.
Good answers.
Drewsov wrote:
And I don't find her to be particularly annoying. Likable? Nope. But she's not annoying, either.
Um . . . *facepalm* ( )
I think you misunderstood me. I didn't ask if you found her to be annoying, and I wasn't supplying her as a choice for people that you would consider removing.
I was simply inquiring as to what you thought about her position. About the fact that her position even existed.
Comprende?
Sure?
I'm fine with her position. More fine with it than I am with, for example, the Department of Homeland Security still being around.
Nix wrote:Any idea if RAtM is putting out new stuff... ever?
I think they are, and I know people who know people who maintain that they are. But nothing official as of yet.
Until then, sate yourself with:
One Day As a Lion (Zack de la Rocha's band with a member of The Mars Volta)
Street Sweeper Social Club (Tom Morello and Boots Riley)
The Nightwatchman (Morello solo)
You were telling him about Buddha, you were telling him about Mohammed in the same breath. You never mentioned one time the Man who came and died a criminal’s death...
You were telling him about Buddha, you were telling him about Mohammed in the same breath. You never mentioned one time the Man who came and died a criminal’s death...
