Everything except the amazing set pieces and imagery. Which were awesome.ChickenSoup wrote:what was so horrible? O_o
The Hobbit Trailer
- Chozon1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 22806
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: In the shadows. Waiting for an oppurtune moment to create a dramatic entrance.
- Contact:

- ChickenSoup
- CCGR addict
- Posts: 3291
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:00 am
- Are you human?: Yes!
- Location: the doomed ship HMS Sinkytowne
- Contact:
lol umadbro
My name is ChickenSoup and I have several flavors in which you may be interested
- Chozon1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 22806
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: In the shadows. Waiting for an oppurtune moment to create a dramatic entrance.
- Contact:
That's too gentle a word.
I canna say the words I have in mind for the 'artistic license' and 'creative vision' of the people working on those movies. This is a fambly site. >_>
I canna say the words I have in mind for the 'artistic license' and 'creative vision' of the people working on those movies. This is a fambly site. >_>

- ChickenSoup
- CCGR addict
- Posts: 3291
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:00 am
- Are you human?: Yes!
- Location: the doomed ship HMS Sinkytowne
- Contact:
I have a "read the whole Silmarillion twice" (however you spell that XD) kind of friend and he literally is nowhere near your level of being offended O_o
Maybe he is just accepting of the "it's not going to be the same as the books" thing? idk lawl
Maybe he is just accepting of the "it's not going to be the same as the books" thing? idk lawl
My name is ChickenSoup and I have several flavors in which you may be interested
- Deepfreeze32
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7041
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 12:00 am
- Are you human?: Yes!
- Location: On the run from Johnny Law; ain't no trip to Cleveland
- Contact:
Or, maybe, (I'm one of those Silmarillion types too) he's realized that artistic license isn't a bad thing at all. Look at the Lord of the Rings movies. They aren't exactly like the book, but you tell me how you would fit what would easily be 15+ hours of filmable material into a movie that would actually be view-able by the normal person, and then we can talk.
Wow. Run-on sentence. Anyway, I think it's obvious that the reason Frodo shows up is because the movie is a frame story. You may say "But that's not how the book was!" The core story is still there, wrapped around an external narrative. If you have a problem with frame stories in adaptations, please destroy your copy of The Princess Bride movie at once.
In all seriousness, it's just a story-telling device.
So forgive us if it seems silly of you to spew movie hate like this.
Wow. Run-on sentence. Anyway, I think it's obvious that the reason Frodo shows up is because the movie is a frame story. You may say "But that's not how the book was!" The core story is still there, wrapped around an external narrative. If you have a problem with frame stories in adaptations, please destroy your copy of The Princess Bride movie at once.

So forgive us if it seems silly of you to spew movie hate like this.

-
- donkey
- Posts: 2546
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:00 am
- Are you human?: Not likely
- Contact:
To be fair, the original Princess Bride book is like a frame story within a frame story.Deepfreeze32 wrote:Or, maybe, (I'm one of those Silmarillion types too) he's realized that artistic license isn't a bad thing at all. Look at the Lord of the Rings movies. They aren't exactly like the book, but you tell me how you would fit what would easily be 15+ hours of filmable material into a movie that would actually be view-able by the normal person, and then we can talk.
Wow. Run-on sentence. Anyway, I think it's obvious that the reason Frodo shows up is because the movie is a frame story. You may say "But that's not how the book was!" The core story is still there, wrapped around an external narrative. If you have a problem with frame stories in adaptations, please destroy your copy of The Princess Bride movie at once.In all seriousness, it's just a story-telling device.
So forgive us if it seems silly of you to spew movie hate like this.

But I agree.
- Deepfreeze32
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7041
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 12:00 am
- Are you human?: Yes!
- Location: On the run from Johnny Law; ain't no trip to Cleveland
- Contact:
Well yes, but...TripExistence wrote:To be fair, the original Princess Bride book is like a frame story within a frame story.![]()

- Chozon1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 22806
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: In the shadows. Waiting for an oppurtune moment to create a dramatic entrance.
- Contact:
Your entire point hinges upon me being a normal individual unwilling to sit through a 27+ hour exact adaptation of the books.
Your point...is lacking. XD
Your point...is lacking. XD

- ChickenSoup
- CCGR addict
- Posts: 3291
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:00 am
- Are you human?: Yes!
- Location: the doomed ship HMS Sinkytowne
- Contact:
well, considering you live in a world in which a major film company took it upon themselves to produce 9 hours (that's not even the director's cut extended edition with extra whatnots and soforths O_o) of awesomeness based in your favorite fantasy world, I don't see a reason to complain... 

My name is ChickenSoup and I have several flavors in which you may be interested
- Chozon1
- Site Admin
- Posts: 22806
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: In the shadows. Waiting for an oppurtune moment to create a dramatic entrance.
- Contact:
There's a list of reasons.
Mostly, they just didn't do it right. They carried the main story along, but did not maintain it close to the books except in major plot points (and even then, they took artistic license).
What they did right, they did really right. What they did wrong is to me a belt sander giving me road rash on my rumpus. No matter how you sit on it, it still burns and chafes and hydrocortisone is of no help at all.
It's just grody pain that's slow to heal.
Not that I won't sit down and watch the entire thing fairly easily. >_>
Edit: You guys should also know that I'm only about 67% serious. Yes, I'm /grumped about how they messed with LOTR, and I'm pretty sure they'll jank with The Hobbit to the point it distracts me and gives me gas. And I'll bludgeon people with giant ear-swabs if they say that the movies are correct to the books. I tend to fart on artisic license when it comes to book-to-movie translation, since it boggles my mind that you'd make a movie about a book and only be 37% in line with said book. Try writing your own story sometime instead of boogering an already written one.
But it's just a movie.
I whine about it, but it's just because these books are so special to me. I'm glad they're remaking The Hobbit, if only for the current generation. So...yeah. It's not going to change my life whether The Hobbit has Galadriel leading the expedition and Frodo tagging along as a videographer.
I just hope they do an epic Smaug. O_o

What they did right, they did really right. What they did wrong is to me a belt sander giving me road rash on my rumpus. No matter how you sit on it, it still burns and chafes and hydrocortisone is of no help at all.

Not that I won't sit down and watch the entire thing fairly easily. >_>
Edit: You guys should also know that I'm only about 67% serious. Yes, I'm /grumped about how they messed with LOTR, and I'm pretty sure they'll jank with The Hobbit to the point it distracts me and gives me gas. And I'll bludgeon people with giant ear-swabs if they say that the movies are correct to the books. I tend to fart on artisic license when it comes to book-to-movie translation, since it boggles my mind that you'd make a movie about a book and only be 37% in line with said book. Try writing your own story sometime instead of boogering an already written one.
But it's just a movie.

I just hope they do an epic Smaug. O_o

- ChickenSoup
- CCGR addict
- Posts: 3291
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:00 am
- Are you human?: Yes!
- Location: the doomed ship HMS Sinkytowne
- Contact:
CHOZON
pretty sure the froderp and galadrifail parts are only li'l bitty bites of parts
SRSLY
/notsrseitherheh
pretty sure the froderp and galadrifail parts are only li'l bitty bites of parts
SRSLY
/notsrseitherheh
My name is ChickenSoup and I have several flavors in which you may be interested
- Oblivions_Key
- Gamer
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:19 pm
- Are you human?: Yes!
- Location: Someplace where you need either a yellow wristband or a leprechaun to get to
- Contact:
Just thought id add that I own the entire original printing box set of the four books 

- ArcticFox
- CCGR addict
- Posts: 3507
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:00 am
- Are you human?: Yes!
- Contact:
Am I the only one who saw the LOTR trilogy before I read it?
(Yes, I did read it later...)
(Yes, I did read it later...)
"He who takes offense when no offense is intended is a fool, and he who takes offense when offense is intended is a greater fool."
—Brigham Young
"Don't take refuge in the false security of consensus."
—Christopher Hitchens
—Brigham Young
"Don't take refuge in the false security of consensus."
—Christopher Hitchens
- Bruce_Campbell
- Master Gamer
- Posts: 572
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:00 am
- Contact:
Seriously? And I always thought you were a respectable nerd...ArcticFox wrote:Am I the only one who saw the LOTR trilogy before I read it?
(Yes, I did read it later...)
A vegan atheist walks into a bar. Bartender says "Hey, are you a vegan atheist? Just kidding, you've mentioned it like eight times already."
- ChickenSoup
- CCGR addict
- Posts: 3291
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 12:00 am
- Are you human?: Yes!
- Location: the doomed ship HMS Sinkytowne
- Contact:
oh dude you just lost all your credArcticFox wrote:Am I the only one who saw the LOTR trilogy before I read it?
(Yes, I did read it later...)
My name is ChickenSoup and I have several flavors in which you may be interested